Russia and Obstruction

panchukerpanchuker BabyGroot
With Mueller set to testify next month, we should get some more details.

In the meantime, something that I've not heard many people comment on, but I've not been able to get over. The Trump team's defense is that there can be no obstruction if there isn't enough evidence of a crime.

Like, does the defense not understand what obstruction is? Like, Mueller said Trumps team tried to prevent him from finding evidence (obstruction), then Mueller not finding substantial evidence means that Trump didn't try to prevent him from finding evidence? That's very short circle logic that makes no fucking sense.

That's insane. Let me intimidate this witness, in the open, then claim I'm not guilty of intimidating witness because they refused to testify.
Sign In or Register to comment.